Case Study: Inclusion Economics India in partnership with Highly Respected Connecticut University

inclusion_economics_india_engagespark_case_study

Executive summary

  • Goal: understand the issues 300,000 returning migrants face in one of the states of India
  • 11,766 completed surveys on financial inclusion, of which 30% are thanks to automated call retries
  • More than 85,000 calls were made in 3 days
  • The survey consisted of 291 steps (questions were dependent on previous answers)
  • More than 400,000 migrants called in 3 months

Inclusion Economics India Centre is based at Krea University and works in close collaboration with a highly respected Connecticut university. The research group collaborates with state and central governments in conducting research focused on improving governance, environmental protection, financial inclusion, health, nutrition, and gender equality that affects millions of lives.


Background & goal

In the second quarter of 2020, following the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent nationwide lockdown in India, Inclusion Economics India reached out to engageSPARK about using the engageSPARK platform to conduct a Voice IVR survey. The program aims to better understand:

  • the issues returning migrants are facing
  • whether they have access to government benefits
  • whether they are interested in learning more about the different government schemes

The survey reached out to 300,000 low-income workers returning to their native state.

The survey

Inclusion Economics India created a Voice IVR survey campaign on the engageSPARK platform that had 291 survey questions on financial inclusion and the government’s financial schemes, with 12-15 unique village-specific questions for contacts coming from 277 different panchayats (villages).

Using engageSPARK’s message condition feature on each question of the IVR campaign, Inclusion Economics India configured the 291-question survey to only ask particular questions if the contact is from a certain village based on the village code from the contact’s profile.

At the beginning of the survey, the contact is asked to confirm that they are living in the village attributed to them by pressing 1 for yes and 2 for no.  If the contact confirms by pressing 1 on their phone’s keypad, the engageSPARK system’s jump logic (or jump to question) feature moves the contact to a certain part of the campaign and asks the questions specific for that village.  If the contact presses 2, indicating that they are not living in the village, the goodbye message plays and the survey ends for that contact.

Inclusion Economics India also scheduled 4 call retries; when a contact doesn’t pick up the call, the engageSPARK system keeps retrying according to a pre-set schedule until the contact picks up or all retries are exhausted – whichever comes first.

In June 2020, Inclusion Economics India launched a pilot test to approximately 4,500 contacts in the study state. After the pilot run, Inclusion Economics India began rolling out the survey to its 300,000 contacts over the course of 3 phases, with the goal being to enroll all contacts in their database in the Voice IVR survey.

Results – 85,000+ calls made in 3 days

In October 2020, Inclusion Economics India started phase 1 and sent the Voice IVR survey to over 85,000 contacts where the calls were made in just 3 days with 2 call time windows each day: 7:30 AM IST – 10:30 AM IST and 5:30 PM IST – 9:00 PM IST. This means that the engageSPARK system only sent out calls within the given window and it automatically stopped calling outside the window.

Inclusion Economics India’s target was to engage at least 200 numbers from each village and to get at least 30 responses from each. With over 85,000 contacts enrolled in the IVR survey for phase 1, they were able to gather these data:

  • 21,165 contacts answered the first question on the survey
  • 11,766 contacts reached the last question and completed the survey
  • There was a 10% drop off per question, meaning that for every 100 contacts that answered the first question, only 90 continued to the second question, and so on
  • 2 minutes and 14 seconds was the average length of time contacts stayed on the call

Out of the 11,766 contacts who completed the survey, 3,481 were a direct result of engageSPARK’s built-in call retry.  The call retry feature allowed them to get a higher completion rate.

Number of retry Additional completed surveys Call delay after the previous call
1st 2,069 15 minutes
2nd 827 30 minutes
3rd 361 1 hour
4th 224 24 hours

 

Of those that answered any of the calls and went through the survey questions, 15,356 contacts responded that they were interested to know more and join the schemes being offered by the government.

The phone numbers of the project’s research participants had been recently updated, so Inclusion Economics India had high hopes regarding survey answers and participation rates. They were not disappointed.  Almost 12,000 completed surveys—13% of the people they reached out to—is quite a good response rate, especially considering that the participants were not expecting the survey.

inclusion_economics_india_engagespark_case_study

Conclusion

The engageSPARK platform enabled Inclusion Economics India’s program to create 291 messages with multiple complicated functionalities. Inclusion Economics India used conditions and jump logic in one Voice IVR survey campaign and launched it to over 85,000 unique phone numbers for phase 1.

engageSPARK’s call time window allowed them to schedule the calls to go out during times when participants were likely to answer. Their overall survey completion rate was significantly increased because of the automated call retries.

They continued to phase 2 in early December 2020 and phase 3 a week after, aiming for project completion before the end of 2020. From the initial plan of reaching 300,000 low-income workers, they closed 2020 having reached out to over 400,000 phone numbers.

The project was extended until March 2021 to reach the target sample again to understand more aspects related to the research.

How It Works:

epod_yale_engagespark_case_study